Comparison of efficiency of Kinesio (R) taping and electrical stimulation in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.WoS.categoriesOrthopedicsen_US
dc.authorid0009-0008-4638-4667en_US
dc.authorwosidAAE-2173-2020en_US
dc.authorwosidAAC-6019-2020en_US
dc.authorwosidAAC-5785-2020en_US
dc.contributor.authorDereli, Elif Elçin
dc.contributor.authorKuru, Tuğba
dc.contributor.authorYalıman, Ayşe
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-21T13:09:34Z
dc.date.available2021-01-21T13:09:34Z
dc.date.issued2012-09
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of Kinesio (R) taping and electrical stimulation in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome. Methods: Thirty patients (26 females, 4 females; mean age: 32.9 +/- 12.2 years) with patellofemoral pain syndrome were equally divided into two groups; the KT group receiving Kinesio (R) taping and an exercise program, and the ES group receiving electrical stimulation and the same exercise program. All patients received stretching and strengthening exercises for the lower extremity under the supervision of a physiotherapist in the outpatient unit 3 times a week for 6 weeks (18 sessions). Patients were evaluated for pain (visual analog scale), range of motion (using a goniometer), muscle strength (manual muscle test), functional condition (step test, triple-jump test, knee flexion test and Kujala patellofemoral score), and quality of life (SF-36) before and after treatment. Results: Visual analog scale scores were reduced by 3.33 and 3.93 and Kujala patellofemoral scores increased by 8.93 and 9.66 for the KT and ES groups, respectively. Both these improvements were statistically significant (p<0.05). While improvements were observed in functional tests, range of motion, and muscle strength values in both groups; there were no significant differences between the two groups (p>0.05). There were statistically significant improvements in the SF-36 scores in both groups (p<0.05) and these improvements were of a similar rate (p>0.05). Conclusion: Kinesio (R) taping and electrical stimulation have similar effects on decreasing pain, improving functional condition, increasing muscle strength and improving quality of life and neither are superior in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome.en_US
dc.fullTextLevelFull Texten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3944/AOTT.2012.2682en_US
dc.identifier.issn1017-995X
dc.identifier.pmid23268824en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84874016691en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11411/3153
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2012.2682
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000319231800011en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.issue5en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.nationalInternationalen_US
dc.numberofauthors3en_US
dc.pages385-392en_US
dc.publisherTurkish Assoc Orthopaedics Traumatologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofActa Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Turcicaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectElectrical stimulationen_US
dc.subjectKinesio (R) tapingen_US
dc.subjectpatellofemoral pain syndromeen_US
dc.titleComparison of efficiency of Kinesio (R) taping and electrical stimulation in patients with patellofemoral pain syndromeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.volume46en_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Dereli 2012.pdf
Boyut:
152.36 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.71 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Faculty of Health Sciences
PubMed Indexed Publications
Scopus Indexed Publications
Web of Science Indexed Publications