Hekim ve hastanenin cerrahi robot kullanımının hastaya verdiği zarardan sorumluluğu
Yükleniyor...
Dosyalar
Tarih
2021
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
ÖZET: Tıbbi robotların bir alt türü olan cerrahi robotların kullanımı yabancı ülkelerin yanı sıra ülkemizde de giderek yaygınlaşmaktadır. Ancak günümüz uygulamasında cerrahi robotlar kendi kendine öğrenen, öğrendikleri neticesinde yeni kararlar veren veya cerrahi müdahaleyi tamamen bağımsız olarak yürütebilen seviyeye henüz ulaşmamıştır. Örneğin cerrahi robotların en başarılı ve yaygın örneği olan da Vinci cerrahi robot tamamı ile hekimin kontrolünde ve hekimin komutları ile hareket etmektedir. Bunun yanı sıra ROBODOC gibi yine kendi kendine öğrenemeyen; ancak sınırlı da olsa bağımsızlığı olan robotlardan da faydalanılmaktadır. Cerrahi robotların sağlık hizmetine dahil edilmesi ile beraber hekim ve hastanenin robotik cerrahiye bağlı olarak hastaya verilen zarardan sorumluluğunun tartışılması gerekmektedir. Bu tartışma, cerrahi robotun otonomi derecesine bağlı olarak şekillenir. Bu çalışmada hekim ve hastanenin sorumluluğu, robotun otonomi derecesine bağlı olarak özellikle TBK md. 116 hükmü kapsamında değerlendirilmiştir.
ABSTRACT: The utilization of surgical robots which are sub-category of medical robots becomes widespread in our country as it is in foreign countries. However, it shall be mentioned that the surgical robots have not reached to a level that can selflearn, decide or conduct the surgery independently in today’s practice. As an example, da Vinci surgical robots which are the most common and successful model of surgical robots can perform under the control of physician and operated directly by physician’s commands. That being mentioned, there are robots such as RO-BODOC which also cannot self-learn but have a limited independency. With the integration of surgical robots in healthcare, the legal responsibility of the physician and the hospital for the damage caused by robotic surgery to the patient should be discussed. This discussion is shaped depending on the degree of autonomy of the surgical robot. Thus, the legal responsibility of the treating party has been evaluated especially under the provision TCO Art 116 accordingly with the degree of autonomy of the robot.
ABSTRACT: The utilization of surgical robots which are sub-category of medical robots becomes widespread in our country as it is in foreign countries. However, it shall be mentioned that the surgical robots have not reached to a level that can selflearn, decide or conduct the surgery independently in today’s practice. As an example, da Vinci surgical robots which are the most common and successful model of surgical robots can perform under the control of physician and operated directly by physician’s commands. That being mentioned, there are robots such as RO-BODOC which also cannot self-learn but have a limited independency. With the integration of surgical robots in healthcare, the legal responsibility of the physician and the hospital for the damage caused by robotic surgery to the patient should be discussed. This discussion is shaped depending on the degree of autonomy of the surgical robot. Thus, the legal responsibility of the treating party has been evaluated especially under the provision TCO Art 116 accordingly with the degree of autonomy of the robot.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Medical Robot, Surgical Robot, Da Vinci Surgical Robot, Robotic Surgery, Autonomy of Robot, Tıbbi Robot, Cerrahi Robot, Da Vinci Cerrahi Robot, Robotik Cerrahi, Robotun Otonomisi
Kaynak
Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi
