Referendum Paradox for Party-List Proportional Representation

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridDindar, Hayrullah/0000-0001-6724-2045|LAINE, Jean/0000-0002-7305-7556
dc.authorwosidDindar, Hayrullah/L-6020-2018
dc.contributor.authorDindar, Hayrullah
dc.contributor.authorLaffond, Gilbert
dc.contributor.authorLaine, Jean
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-18T20:40:40Z
dc.date.available2024-07-18T20:40:40Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractWe consider two-tiers elections based on closed party-list proportional representation (PLPR), where party platforms involving multiple dichotomous issues are endogenously determined by their supporters' preferences (via issue-wise simple majority voting). Assuming that voters compare platforms according to the criterion of the Hamming distance and provided a high enough number of voters and issues, we show that the outcome of PLPR may be Pareto dominated by the multiple referendum outcome defined as the issue-wise majority will in the whole electorate. We refer to this situation as the PLPR paradox. We characterize the set of party platforms for which the PLPR paradox is possible. We also investigate several restrictions upon voting situations that may be sufficient for avoiding the paradox.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCNRS PICS exchange program [08001]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding was provided by CNRS PICS exchange program (Grant No. 08001).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10726-020-09713-y
dc.identifier.endpage220en_US
dc.identifier.issn0926-2644
dc.identifier.issn1572-9907
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85095758558en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage191en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-020-09713-y
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11411/7171
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000588274900001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofGroup Decision and Negotiationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectProportional Representationen_US
dc.subjectMajority Ruleen_US
dc.subjectVoting Paradoxen_US
dc.subjectComparative Perspectiveen_US
dc.subjectIncentivesen_US
dc.subjectCultivateen_US
dc.subjectMajorityen_US
dc.titleReferendum Paradox for Party-List Proportional Representation
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Web of Science Indexed Publications
Scopus Indexed Publications